©2013 Dorian Taddei
Certainly, claims of advanced science in the archaic past is nothing new. Entire libraries are fully of books making — in some cases — solid arguments for this. Even a cursory review of known sites — Teotihuacan, Tiwanaku, Palenque, Baalbek, the Caroline Islands (see Nan Madol), Baalbek, Stonehenge, Karahunj — demonstrates that extremely sophisticated technology and advanced sciences not only existed in the distant past, but that the sciences of the ancients, in certain aspects, was far more advanced than the basic material sciences taught in today's schools. To clarify, mainstream science — that in the open scientific journals — cannot explain many of the advances made anciently. This is not to say that 'no one' knows what the key to such sciences is, only that this science is not (yet) public knowledge.
This mysterious gap in understanding is precisely what the 'ancient alien' crowd always points to as evidence of prehistory tinkering on the part of extraterrestrials bent on teaching, exploring or altering the evolution of mankind. However, as the scientific axiom known as Occam's Razor suggests, the truth is usually the simplest, or most efficient theory, not one that stretches credulity, and for which no evidence exists. However, such simplistic answers appeal to some. We see these as two extreme examples of the dismissal of the obvious. At one end are the self-proclaimed 'skeptics,' who dare not question contemporary, mainstream thinking (whatever this happens to be at the moment). And on the other side we have everything from theories of UFO crash landings and aliens taking advantage of the promiscuity of earth girls (who cannot resist a spaceman in uniform, apparently) to genetic modifications of early pre-human DNA for the purpose of biologically engineering a better gold-mining troglodyte. What we have learned is that the answer to the riddles of antiquity are not found in exotic 'ancient alien' stories (although we do not say no one might have visited earth from elsewhere). They are found in a reevaluation of the entire concept of evolution, as it is taught today.
As to the answer to the question of vanished technologies and technological societies, this is a complex topic. One must first recognize the incredibly long periods between the appearances of what we would call 'civilization,' as well as its rapid appearance. It is not the end of a civilization where the most sophisticated archaeological relics are found, but usually at its inception. The hard thing to do is to recognize this. For example, most early societies erect massive monuments. Later generations may still live at these sites, but the ability to produce the same sophisticated structures, the stone cutting and citing technology, the tools used for moving and assembling the massive block used, however, are not to be found.
SHRINKING BRAINS - QUOTES
If Modern Humans Are So Smart, Why Are Our Brains Shrinking? | DiscoverMagazine.com
“Bailey and Geary found population density did indeed track closely with brain size, but in a surprising way. When population numbers were low, as was the case for most of our evolution, the cranium kept getting bigger. But as population went from sparse to dense in a given area, cranial size declined, highlighted by a sudden 3 to 4 percent drop in EQ starting around 15,000 to 10,000 years ago. ‘We saw that trend in Europe, China, Africa, Malaysia—everywhere we looked,’ Geary says.
“The observation led the researchers to a radical conclusion: As complex societies emerged, the brain became smaller because people did not have to be as smart to stay alive. As Geary explains, individuals who would not have been able to survive by their wits alone could scrape by with the help of others—supported, as it were, by the first social safety nets.
“Geary is not implying that our beetle-browed forebears would have towered over us intellectually. But if Cro-Magnons had been raised with techno-toys and the benefits of a modern education, he ventures, ‘I’m sure we would get good results. Don’t forget, these guys were responsible for the ‘cultural explosion’ — a revolution in thinking that led to such startling new forms of expression as cave paintings, specialized tools, and bones carved into the first flutes. In terms of raw innate smarts, he believes, they probably were as ‘bright as today’s brightest’ and might even have surpassed us…”
“The new genetic adaptations, some 2,000 in total, are not limited to the well-recognized differences among ethnic groups in superficial traits such as skin and eye color. The mutations relate to the brain, the digestive system, life span, immunity to pathogens, sperm production, and bones—in short, virtually every aspect of our functioning.
“Many of these DNA variants are unique to their continent of origin, with provocative implications. ‘It is likely that human races are evolving away from each other,’ says University of Utah anthropologist Henry Harpending, who coauthored a major paper on recent human evolution. ‘We are getting less alike, not merging into a single mixed humanity.’
“Harpending theorizes that the attitudes and customs that distinguish today’s humans from those of the past may be more than just cultural, as historians have widely assumed. ‘We aren’t the same as people even a thousand or two thousand years ago,’ he says.
“Not surprisingly, the new findings have raised hackles . . . Yet even skeptics now admit that some human traits, at least, are evolving rapidly, challenging yesterday’s hallowed beliefs.
“. . .Bones don’t lie. John Hawks of the University of Wisconsin at Madison likes evidence he can put his hands on, so he takes me on a tour of the university’s bone laboratory . . . unlocks a glass case and begins arranging human skulls and other skeletal artifacts — some genuine fossils, others high-quality reproductions — on a counter according to their age. Gesturing toward these relics, which span the past 35,000 years, Hawks says, ‘You don’t have to look hard to see that teeth are getting smaller, skull size is shrinking, stature is getting smaller.’
“These overriding trends are similar in many parts of the world, but other changes, especially over the past 10,000 years, are distinct to specific ethnic groups. . . . ‘It beats me how leading biologists could look at the fossil record and conclude that human evolution came to a standstill 50,000 years ago,’ Hawks says.”
THE LAST RACE - GIANTS
A news article that came across my desk only yesterday (August 15th, 2013) offers radiometric dating of some unusual petroglyphs that are carved into limestone tufa along the ancient shoreline of Lake Winnemucca in northern Nevada. This is near the site of the annual "Burning Man" festivals. These glyphs have been dated to at least 10,500 years before present. This dating corresponds to other finds in the western United States, including the mummies and remains of four giants discovered in the area. Skeletal remains of these large (8-1/2 to 12 foot) individuals still exist in different museums in Nevada, but not a single scientists is allowed to test those remains, due to the "Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act." This is just the tip of the proverbial iceberg when it comes to the red tape standing between the rediscovery of true history of America, and politics. Similar issues have become a major impediment to archaeological research across the world. And so you see the truth is not so easy to come by.
Most of the petroglyphs at ancient rock art sites are ancient, esoteric ideograms. This single fact has made decipherment almost impossible . . . until we came along, that is. More on our decipherment of these esoteric ideograms can be found both on this website, and at http://www.spagyricarts.com, for those interested in our work.
What we do know is that trivial, day-to-date experiences were not etched into stone in the distant past. The answers to why the ancients did not draw objective art (for the most part), is a complex question, but what we know is their glyphs held important information, and were not made casually. Most of the rock art sites we know of make their appearance about the same time as those at Lake Winnemucca, just following the last Ice Age. However, the ice was once over two miles high in places in the Northern Hemisphere, and when that melted, the world's oceans rose as much as 100 feet (average) in many places. Since 90% of todays cities lie along the shoreline of the great oceans, and this was certainly even more the case before the last Ice Age, this sort of flooding would have buried most of the world's cultures under the oceans of the world. And in fact, we are only now discovering many such inundated civilizations, as city after city is discovered under the silt and debris left by just such flooding.
Another problem in the way of many answering these ancient mysteries lies in understanding the forces at work driving the loss of knowledge and technologies. One of those forces has received a lot of press since 1994, when the multiple impacts of the 22 fragments of comet Shoemaker-Levy-9 smacked into Jupiter. This was a real wake-up call for astrophysicists who were shocked that such large comets were still round today. Their modeling of the origins of our solar system are simply wrong! Comets impacts (both on land and in the sea), and even planetary-comet close encounters, have seriously disrupted the transmission of knowledge from the past into the present. This legacy of repeated cyclic disasters, is only now becoming accepted by mainstream science, which for years denied any such thing was possible. Their reasons for ignoring the obvious stemmed from other false assumptions, these intern were the product of an entirely false concept of the creation of the universe, known as the Big Bang. As it is with logic, and this goes double for inductive logic (vs. deductive logic, frowned upon by modern scientists), a false premise is almost certainly guaranteed to lead to an ever widening number of false assumptions. If the universe is in fact "steady-state," which we believe, then all bets are off, and we're literally back to the beginning in terms of our understanding of everything from the formation of the Sun and planets, to our assumptions of the age of the universe and so on. how could so many have made such a Big Bang blunder? We aver that this mistake can be traced back to false assumptions of the true nature of light. In terms of cosmology, one false idea (bad theory) leads to ever more confusion.
RETURN OF THE GOLDEN AGE
[More Copy Soon]
This great loss of alchemical knowledge is about to be rectified. This is the purpose of our various publications, and the intent of this release of information on the legendary Green Dragon elixir. That these secrets must once more be made known among modern peoples, is our heartfelt belief. However, as has always been the case, only those spiritually and intellectually prepared to receive such truths should be given them. Truly, history records what happens when such proverbial pearls are cast in front of dumb beasts. Not only are these truths not recognized for their real worth, but those who are not prepared to receive such things, always begin by looking upon those who prize such knowledge first with disdain, and eventually with envy and even hatred.
Today, mainstream scientists paint alchemy as the primitive antecedent of modern chemistry — its superior scion. However, those less quick to accept such conclusions may find themselves wondering if there was actually some truth to these pervasive and enduring myths of an ‘elixir of life?’ How could so many people — in fact, entire cultures — have been so very wrong? And why did some of the brightest men and women of the times think such things could exist? If there was no truth to the claims of the ancient sages, occult hierophants and esoteric alchemists, why did this sacred science persist for millennia? In fact, the recent discovery of a ‘cup & groove’ petroglyph in the Pradesh region of central India, demonstrates that alchemy was being practiced as far back 250,000-650,000 years before present!
We find it quite common to think in terms of life extension in the 21st century. However, our modern version of life extension is generally linked to human overriding of the immune system, the removal of clusters of cancer cells with steel blades and lasers, and the destruction of such cells (as well as bacteria) using poisons; processes that often inflict more damage than they do good. By way of contrast, ancient alchemy was a method of driving the body’s immune system to do better what it naturally does anyway — under optimized, energetic conditions. Does it seem so far-fetched that the ancients believed that life extension was possible, even if their idea of how this was to be accomplished was different than our own? We hold that their methods were often far superior, safer, and in most cases superior to out own.
Based on our modern way of understanding ancient man, anthropological and technological paradigms conform our thinking into visualizing ancient man as inferior and primitive, when compared to ourselves. We are repeatedly reminded of the fact that mankind rose from apes to modern man over millions of years. We are told that there was a single ancestor for all of mankind that originated in Africa, and slowly made its way across the plant via land bridges, and that this gradual evolution reached some sort of apotheosis in ancient Greece. We imagine man as moving from simple stone tools to the use of metals, and from primitive mythological religion with its pantheons of unusual gods, to modern philosophy and the illumination scientific process. Who would question this well-established paradigm?
As we unveil the Great Arcanum, we will see that most of our premises are incorrect, or at least flawed. From our concept of the origins and forces of the cosmos, down to our concept of evolution, we are fundamentally wrong! And so our conceptualization and characterization of the ancient races of “Man” as primitive — both technologically, as well as philosophically — i likewise flawed. Not all of our ancient ancestors were advanced. In fact, what we will demonstrate is that mankind is in a constant state of DEVOLUTION, and that those who came first were, by extension, superior intellectually, physically and intuitively to any expression of the Homo genus we see in modern times. However, these brief impulses of apotheosis were limited to individuals, and to those individuals who learned and applied techniques that drove consciousness and spiritual evolution. Mankind the ‘animal’ remains forever locked into cycles of devolution. For entropy is a universal constant, and only through the application of negenetropic energy can this be reversed. It is the ‘science’ of applied negentropy that concerns us as we plumb the secrets in the archaic past. For mankind was not always so naive about the origins and destiny of his soul. It is we who need to reflect back to the mythological “Golden Age” if we are to understand the true nature of the “secret of the ages.”
It was in fact the first impulse of consciousness that drove mankind to its true zenith of creative and spiritual achievement. In this sense, Darwinian theory has got it completely backwards. As we re-examine our own ideas of what is and is not ’primitive,’ it becomes apparent that the approach of the ancients to astrology, healing, even religion (philosophy) was, in many ways, far more sophisticated than our own. For example, although modern allopathic medicine does offer many insights into organic processes that are truly extraordinary, and techniques used in modern medicine would truly appear magical to the ancients, the ancient approach to healing was superior, and certainly wiser in many ways, as will be shown.
Our evidence suggests that alchemy, known as the Great Work, has been around for at least 22,000 years. Certainly this was not in the same form as we know it today, or from the renaissance or medieval periods, but the basics were certainly in place by this time. However, the practice of pulverizing rock, and processing it with heat, acids and bases, extends back well into the Pleistocene, and proves to be the same science. We can only guess at that these truly archaic alchemists might have known, and how much of their work was what we could call science, and how much was understood through intuition and visions?
At least in terms of mineral processing, the further back we go, the more we find the processing of very hard, high iron silica-based ores — evidenced by cup and groove marks ground into extremely hard metamorphic quartzite, at two ancient caves in India: the Auditorium Cave at Bhimbetka and a rock shelter at Daraki-Chattan.
At these sites the earliest cave art consists of numerous quartzite cupules - non-utilitarian hemispherical cup-shaped depressions. Scientists insist that these were merely hammered out of the rock surfaces, but we believe that further research will reveal what we have already proved at cupola, cup and groove and cup and ring marked sites in North America, namely, that these cupolas were cracked using burning coal, then cracked with cold water in their red hot states. This both serves to shatter the rock for easy grinding, but also oxiidizes the ore making later acid oxidation far easier with relatively weak reagents, such as Sal Ammoniac (ammonium chloride).
Accurate dating of such metamorphic cuples has been problematic, but estimates provide dates stretching back perhaps as far as 390,00 - 700,000 years — suggesting advanced technology existed in the distant epochs preceding the rise of Homo erectus.
How is this possible? We do not have sufficient data to begin to unravel the history of these truly archaic peoples, but in the section of our web site which is to be called, "Human Devolution," we will propose a new and coherent theory of evolution, which stands to answer at least some of the questions arising from these incredible revelations.
It is our hope that the occult analysis of the Green Dragon elixirs and their mechanism of action, demonstrates that it is modern man, in point of fact, who is the ignorant one. Our current interpretation of esoteric history has us labeling the greatest minds of the renaissance, like the philosopher and physician Paracelsus as latecomers to the alchemical sciences. It is time we reconsider this position in light of these breakthroughs.
As you, the reader of this seminal work will soon discover, we finally have some definite answers to this ageless mystery concerning the true scientific basis behind ancient esoteric alchemy, and the answer is that there is, in fact, truth behind the fables! Now, for the first time in perhaps thousands of years, not only can we once again comprehend the chemical nature of these elixirs of life, but can actually understand the source mineralogy used, the components responsible for the effects within the body, and even the actual mechanisms at work in these legendary substances. The myth has become science!
What history does record has come to be thought of as nothing more than myths, based in ignorance and superstition. However, what Taddei has discovered represents nothing less than an occult rosetta stone. We can now begin to decrypt the ancient esoteric symbols of antiquity, which provides entirely novel insights into both the ’arts’ of Alchemy as well as Astrology, and how these were practiced in the ancient world. These on-going discoveries shed a new light on the ontological veracity of the ancient world view.
• • • • • • •
For Store Location Map and Hours of Operation CLICK HERE.